Chapter 3. Moses, Moses
Part1 The Civil State
Moses said unto the people, Remember this day, in which ye came out
from Egypt, out of the house of bondage; for by strength of hand the LORD brought you out from this [place]: there
shall no leavened bread be eaten.” Ex. 13:3
Moses was a leader of a nation. He
took the people out of a particular kind of governmental system and
then he taught a system of faith where men’s allegiance was to
their own God-given conscience and not under the authority of other
The Ten Commandments was not a
religious document, but, like the 12 tablets of Rome, it was the
foundational laws of an entire nation and its government.
For four hundred years, men governed
themselves in a free Republic under God, not as the property and
resources of the central state government or economy, but as free
souls under God. What was this government called “Israel”
like? How was it intended to work and why did they call it Israel, where God prevailed? How did the Israelites end up in Egypt?
we want better people to make a better world, then we will have to
begin where people are made, in the family.”
Joseph’s brothers delivered him
into bondage as a result of their own selfishness, envy, and covetous
hearts. Had they not done this, Joseph’s relation with God
would have revealed to them the coming events. It would have been
Israel, not Egypt, that would have prepared for the famine to come.
The sons of Jacob would have become wealthy among nations. Instead,
they betrayed the Law of the Family and cast the source of their own
salvation into a pit of jealousy, envy, and pride. The family broke
down, and, without it, their days would not be long upon the land.
The individual contributed to and
relied upon his family and the family contributed and sometimes
relied upon the community. There were thousands of systems provided
by communities to establish this social safety net, but two disparate
forms prevail. One of these forms has, in its nature, the hope of
strengthening the family, the foundation, and the second, by its
degenerate nature, weakens the family and the individuals within it
while centralizing control in others. The latter of these forms could
be called “civil”.
civil law reduces the unwilling freedman to his original slavery; but
the laws of the Angloes judge once manumitted as ever after free.”
Why is it believed that the civil law
reduces a man to slavery and what is so different about the law of
the Angloes? What do they mean “civil
law”? Again, “civil” contains the concept of
subjection and duty to the will of a ruling body to which the
individual is subject. While civil structures tend to create strong
central government, they have a tendency to weaken the individual as
he becomes more reliant upon the civil structures than upon his own
power, knowledge, and ability.
The word “civil” is
defined in several ways:
Pertaining to a city or state, or to a citizen in his relations to
his fellow citizens or to the state; within the city or state.”
An individual might be considered a
citizen as an inhabitant, but not within the jurisdiction of the
civil state. It is also defined:
Subject to government; reduced to order; civilized; not barbarous; --
said of the community.”
Being “barbarous” did not mean cruel or raging out of control, but rather that one had
not been reduced to a subject under a ruling body of the civil state.
He was still a free man under the law of nature and nature’s
Performing the duties of a citizen; obedient to government;....”
Civil law is not self-creating. It is
law within pre-existing maxims of law, sometimes called the Law of
Nature or Divine Will. Without entering into civil societies in a
position of subjectivity, an inhabitant may have rights independent
of the jurisdiction of the civil powers. Yet, in a wider sense, those
inherent rights may still be called “civil
rights” in reference to that fundamental and original
kingdom or dominion of God.
rights are such as belong to every citizen of the state or country,
or, in a wider sense to all its inhabitants, and are not connected
with the organization or the administration of government. They
include the rights of property, marriage, protection by laws, freedom
of contract, trial by jury, etc… as otherwise defined, civil
rights are rights appertaining to a person in virtue of his
citizenship in a state or community. Rights capable of being enforced
or redressed in civil action. Also a term applied to certain rights
secured to citizens of the United States by the thirteenth and
fourteenth amendments to the constitution, and by various acts of
congress made in pursuance thereof.”
In this simple legal definition, there
is divine right not connected to the organization or
administration of civil government and civil rights that are
subject to the state and its ruling power such as Cain,
Nimrod, Egypt, and Rome.
Law, Roman Law, and Roman Civil Law are convertible phrases, meaning
the same system of jurisprudence.”
criminal law was not statutory, but based on Customary Law that
resulted from the Law of Reason or the Law of Nature and Nature’s
God, sometimes called Divine Will. This law was expressed in
government documents like the Ten Commandments. Sometimes, this was
called “common law” which is not subject to statutes, but has been the result of long
understood concepts of right and wrong. Such systems were the rule,
not the exception, and depended on the virtue, wisdom, and justice of
every man within society. The Artifice of Sophistry
Why did people turn out of the way so
quickly and what is the way? How do we find that way and distinguish
it from the ways of the world? God is the same today, and man has not
changed much either, so it is likely that the same error and solution
has remained consistent throughout history. We may also assume that
the adversary has remained the same and is still using, or misusing,
words, and twisting their meaning in order to lead mankind astray.
the fat, and the kidneys, and the caul above the liver of the sin
offering, he burnt upon the altar; as the LORD commanded Moses.
Leviticus 9:10 And the fat of the bullock and of the ram, the rump,
and that which covereth [the inwards], and the kidneys, and the caul
[above] the liver:” Leviticus 9:19
If we examine these verses we shall
discover that words may be given more than one meaning. The word
“fat” is from the Hebrew word cheleb, blx, [Chet, Lamed, Beit], given the Strong's number 2459,
translated “fat, fatness, best, finest, grease, marrow”; and is defined
“fat... choicest, best part, abundance (of products of the
A thousand years ago, the same three
letters, blx ,were split, altered, or interpreted by some translators and
eventually was assigned the Strong's number 2460, appearing as the
name Heleb. It also became the word numbered 2461, translated
“milk, cheeses, and sucking”.
The Masoretic Old Testament didn't
exist until 600 to 1000 years after Jesus was proclaimed King in
Judea. Vowel points were added to the text along with cantillation
marks. The people who did this were obviously influenced by what they
believed were trope and rhetorical schemes. Their sense of religion and their personal interpretation of a
Biblical message guided them to their creative conclusions.
This division of meanings seems
somewhat harmless with this first example, but, if we look at the
word “bullock”, we find it is from the Hebrew word showr, rwv [Shin, Vav, Reish], which is given the Strong's number 7794. It is
said to be from the word shuwr, which is numbered 7788. Both words consist of the same three Hebrew
and are translated “went” and “sing”, but
is said to mean “to travel, journey, go”.
In fact, the same three letters in
Hebrew are also given several other Strong's numbers, from 7786 to
7794. These words are
translated into “ox, bullock,
cow, bull” and even the words “enemy”,
“cut,” and “wall”.
And, when proclaimed to be a verb, it is translated “behold”,
“see”, “look”, “observe”, “lay
wait”, “regard”, and “perceive”.
Strong's 7786, consisting of the same three Hebrew letters, rwv,
is said to mean “to be or act as prince, rule, contend, have
power, prevail over” and is translated “reign,
have power”, and “made
prince”. Can the same word that means “bullock” also mean “given power to
In fact, the common word for “bullock” is par, rp,
[Pei, Reish], numbered 6499, translated that way 127 times and does
not appear as showr, rwv [Shin, Vav, Reish].
What authority the Jewish translators
and clerics of the past have exercised over our thinking today by
making one word mean so many different things! Their election becomes
the foundation of our belief and understanding, and not necessarily
the intent of the authors.
I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone,
“it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor
question is,” said Alice, “whether you may make words
mean so many different things.”
question is: which is to be master - that's all.” from Alice in
This power to modify or even mutate
language is the power to master the minds of men. Take the Hebrew
word “ram”, ayil, lya [Alef, Yod, Lamed], which has the Strong's number 352, and is
translated “ram” 156 times, but is also translated “post” 21 times, “mighty (men)” 4 times, “trees” twice, “lintel” and “oaks” once
each. It is also identical to 353 and 354, which are translated
“hart”, as in a
“hart deer”. This word ayil is said to be the same
as 193, lwa [Alef, Vav, Lamed] and defined “prominence... nobles,
wealthy men”, and is translated as “mighty” and “strength”.
One of the more interesting words in
the short text above is “rump”,
from 'alyah hyla [Alef, Lamed, Yod, Hei] and is numbered 451. The word 'alyah,
is consistently translated “rump”, but it is identical to the word 452, which is the name Elijah and is supposed to mean “Yah is God” or “God is my
We may now understand that the word
“bullock” can mean “rein over the
offering” or “the
power to decide”. While “ram” may mean that someone is given the authority over an offering, which
is given entirely [burnt or given entirely up by the grantor], does
the word we see as “rump” actually mean that we are trusting in God and His ways of freewill
sacrifice under the perfect law of liberty?
The Bible is supposed to be precept
upon precept. God did not change His mind as much as men have changed
their opinion of God. The Pharisees failed to understand the Old
Testament and found themselves in conflict with Christ. In fact,
Moses and Christ were in agreement, but the Pharisees had already
twisted the meaning of the sacred text. There were those who knew the
truth and preached against the animal immolation of these pagan
altars within Herod’s temple. They found themselves in accord
with the gospel of Christ.
In Leviticus 9:19, the phrase “and
that which covereth [the inwards]” comes from a
single word mcacceh, hokm,
numbered 4374, and is translated “that
which covers twice, cover” or “clothing”.
It is said to be from 3680 kacah, meaning “to cover, conceal,
hide” and is identical to 4372 and 4373, which is said
to mean “covering” or “valuation” or
Since the Garden of Eden, we have had
a problem with covering. Even the Levites, who were the ministers of
the sacrifices, were supposed to have the people make their
underwear. They were also not to go up by steps, lest the people see
the priests' nakedness. Nakedness deals with reference to a lack of
authority. Making underwear had nothing to do with cloths and going
up by steps had nothing to do with stairs.
What are these sacred text concerned
with, underwear or exercising authority?
The word kilyah, hylk [Kaf, Lamed, Yod, Hei], numbered 3629, is translated “kidney” 18 times, but it is also translated “reins” 13 times. The word “reins” and “heart” are
often mentioned together, as denoting the whole moral constitution of
man. If we say that someone has a lot of heart, we know that we are
referring to his capacity to love, not his ability to pump blood.
The word kilyah, as an example,
is from kily, ylk, translated “vessel” 166 times, “instrument” 39, and “weapon” 21 times, but also “jewel” 21 times, “stuff” 14, “thing” 11,
“bag” twice with
13 other miscellaneous translations. It is also from the word kalah, hlk, translated “consume” 57 times, “end” 44, but also, “finish” 20 times, “fail” 18, “accomplish” 12, “done” 9,
“left”, “waste” twice each, again with 13 other miscellaneous translations.
Other words formed from these letters
are kol, lk, said to mean “all” ; and koll, llk, defined as “perfect”. Hebrew letters have
meanings. Words were composed based on these original concepts in a
language created to be written, not spoken. If you replace the letter
Hei in “reins” with an Alef, the word becomes “imprison”.
So, the word kilyah, hylk,
has to do with “reins”,
the power of choice or control.
The Phrase “and
the caul” is translated from yatharth, trty [Yod, Tav, Reish, Tav], numbered 3508 in Strong's, and is said
to have the meaning “appendage”,
is from the word yathar, rty,
numbered 3498, 3499, and 3500 translated “leave”,
and “string” and
is the same as the name “Jethro”, said to mean
The word “caul” appears to be the leftovers or extra remaining from the liver, which is yet to be discussed, and may reveal the key to understanding
what the text is trying to impart.
The word we are told means “above” appears in several different forms: Nm , ynm [ Mem, Nun or Mem, Nun, Yod]. These
letter combinations are translated as “among”,
“with”, “from”, “that” “not”,
“since”, “after”, “at”, “by”,
“whether”, “of”, “part”, and even “I”, “me”,
“before”, “after”, “because”,
“therefore”, “out”, “for”,
“than”, and “partly”.
In fact, these words appear as “stringed
instrument”, “whereby”, and 19 other
miscellaneous words. Such
flexibility in interpretation should give cause for concern, if not
alarm. How much influence do translators have over our modern
interpretation of the text? Did God ever intend for us to burn up
dead animals, removing liver and kidneys? For what purpose and to
what end? Or was that a distortion of the Pharisees’ rituals
and superstitions that plagues our thinking today?
The word “liver” is from kabed, dbk,
[Kaf, Beit, Dalet] identified with the Strong's number 3516, is
translated “liver” 14 times. The same three lettered word, kabad, dbk,
numbered 3513, is translated “honour” 34 times, “glorify”,
times each, “heavy” 13 times, “harden” 7, “glorious” 5,
“sore” 3, “made
heavy” 3, “chargeable”,
each, with 10 other miscellaneous translations. It is given the
meaning “to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be
rich, be honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured.”
This word kabad, dbk,
is the same word that we see in f Exodus 20:12 or “honor”:
thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land
which the LORD thy God giveth thee.”
All these words are the same exact
Hebrew letters, dbk [Kaf Beit Delath]. Kaf is said to mean “The Power to Actualize Potential”.
Beit is attributed with the meaning “God’s Dwelling
Place”, and Dalet denotes “Selflessness or Charity”.
The word has to do with giving, abundance, enriching, increasing
wealth with charity. It has to do with thanksgiving.
The same exact three letter word we
see as “liver”, dbk, which appears as Strong's numbers 3514 and 3515 is translated “heavy”, “great”, “sore”,
“hard”, “much”, “laden”, “thick”, “slow”, and
They are defined as “weight,
heaviness, mass, great... massive, abundant, numerous, dull, hard,
difficult, burdensome, very oppressive, numerous, rich.”
How is it that the same three letter
word can be translated so many different ways? How can the same word
that means “liver” also mean “heavy, hardened, honour, glorious, chargeable, sore,
grievous, slow or thick”, etc.? Let us trudge on through this
maze of sophistry and free our minds of any strong delusion that may
have us in its grip.
the sin offering” comes from Strong's 2403 and is
said to appear as both hajx and tajx [Chet, Tet, Alef, Hei and Chet, Tet, Alef,Tav] and is translated “sin” 182 times, but it is also translated “sin
offering” 116, punishment 3 times, “purification
for sin” twice, and “purifying”,
each. These words are from 2398, ajx, which is translated “sin”
188 times, but “purify” 11 times, “cleanse” 8 times, “sinner” 8, “committed” 6,
times, “blame” and “done” twice
each, and “fault, harm, loss,
miss, offender, purge, reconciliation, sinful,
trespass” once each.
This book is not meant to be a lesson
in the Hebrew language, but a pattern should be evident from the
multiple words that are used in place of the original Hebrew. The
room for deception and altering the original intent is broad. The
possibilities are mind boggling.
Even the word “the burnt”
is from the Hebrew word qatar, rjq,
[Kuf, Tet, Reish], given the Strong's number 6999, and is translated
times, and “burn” 49 times, but also translated “offer” 3 times, “kindle”,
and “offering” once each, with 4 other miscellaneous translations. It is said to be
a primitive root, but is identical with Strong's number 7000, qatar, rjq,
and other Strong's numbers 7001 and 7002, which are translated doubts, joints, incense, and joined,
and given the definitions of to “shut
in, enclose, join, knot, joint”,
and even “problem”.
Another word for “burnt
offering” is `olah, 5930, hle, which is translated “burnt
sacrifice”, but also translated “ascent” and “go up”. The
same word, hle ,is also numbered 5927 and 5929, but translated “up” 676 times, “offer” 67, and more than a hundred other times as “come, bring, ascend, go, chew, offering, light, increase, burn, depart, put, spring, raised, arose, break, exalted” and another 33
other miscellaneous ways. The latter is translated “leaf” and “branch”. One
must ask, does the original word have anything to do with fire and
burning things up at all?
Even the Hebrew word, mizbeach, xbzm [Mem, Zayin, Beit, Chet], given the Strong's number 4196, is always
It is from zabach, xbz [Zayin, Beit, Chet], Strong's number 2076, which is translated
times, “offer” 39, “kill” 5,
“slay” 5, but as
Strong's 2077 xbz,
is translated “sacrifice” 155 times, “offerings” 6, and “offer” once. It also appears as the name Zebah, said to mean
“deprived of protection”.
What is the Truth? Each of us must
develop new eyes with which to see and new ears with which to hear ,
working out our own salvation with fear and trembling, striving to
know and do the will of God. There is a standard; it is the Holy
Spirit. It is our comforter and guide by which we may see and hear
the truth of the scriptures and the words of God the Father, as they
are written upon our hearts and our minds.
Large numbers of people knew at
different times in history that there was no call by God for burning
up dead animals and that the altars and temple were to be made of
living earth and living stones. They knew that justice and mercy,
freely given with charity and hope, is for what God has been calling
from the beginning. They knew that men should not covet their
neighbors’ goods nor the wealth of those families, nor their
sons and daughters through the agencies and institutions they devise
also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy
priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by
Jesus Christ.” 1 Peter 2:5
The sophistry of language has mislead
men from the simple truths of God's ways. The authors may have been
inspired. The translators, however, are often lacking that
inspiration, but not their own imagination. The word “heart” may represent an organ or the “capacity
for virtue”. “Kidney” may be and organ or the “power
of choice”. And a “liver” may be an organ or the “honorarium
given” to a minister.
A “stone” may be a chosen friend who is to minister this freewill offering and
a “gathering of stones” may be a council or network of
such friends to assist in a national necessity of charity and hope. A
“burnt offering” may be something simply given up entirely by the contributor.
The simple instructions of the kingdom
and how they make their freewill contributions may have been twisted
into a superstitious, pagan, and mindless ritual of trauma and
bloodletting by altering the meaning of words.
Were these ancient verses trying to
power of choice over the distribution of the honorarium are given
freely to the living ministers of God’s altar, and the surplus
of that offering is their covering to take care of their needs
according to their own power of choice; as the LORD commanded Moses.
This is the strength of God’s way”?
This is the kingdom of God. Ministers
of that government are servants, chosen by the people through the
granting of their contributions. They are tithed to only according to
their service. It is a government where the power of choice to make
contributions remains with, of, and for the people, and coveting your
neighbors’ goods through the agency of institutions created by
men is against The Law. The people are bound by faith, hope, and
charity and everyone lives under and by the perfect law of liberty.
Return to Index of Chapters of "Thy Kingdom Comes"
Order the book
Thy Kingdom Comes